In 2024, a study by the asset management firm Baghunter and yes, there is an asset management firm called Baghunter found that the Hermès Birkin had appreciated at an average annual rate of 14.2% over the previous thirty years. The S&P 500, over the same period, returned approximately 10.2%. Gold: around 7%.
You may read this as a story about handbags. It is actually a story about scarcity, about brand discipline, and about what happens when an object is simultaneously a luxury good, a status signal, and a financial instrument.
Hermès does not make enough Birkins. This is not an accident of production capacity Hermès has the resources, the craftspeople, and the ateliers to produce considerably more. The scarcity is structural. It is, in the most precise sense, manufactured. Waiting lists have been abolished and reinstated and complicated and re-complicated over the years, but the underlying mechanism remains: you cannot simply buy a Birkin. You must be known to Hermès. You must have a purchase history. You must, in the industry’s most revealing phrase, have a relationship.
The relationship is the product.
What you are buying when you buy a Birkin if you can buy one, at retail, which most people cannot is not merely a bag. You are buying proof of access. You are buying membership in a category of customer that Hermès has decided, unilaterally, you belong to. The bag is the receipt.
This explains why the resale market exists and why it commands the premiums it does. On the secondary market Vestiaire Collective, The RealReal, specialist resellers in Paris and Tokyo and Hong Kong a standard Birkin 30 in Togo leather trades at between 150% and 250% of its retail price. Exotic skins, rare colours, and vintage pieces command multiples that would be considered excessive even in contemporary art.
The financial logic is straightforward: if demand structurally exceeds supply, and if the brand maintains the discipline not to fill that gap, price goes up. The Birkin’s appreciation is less a tribute to Hermès’s craftsmanship which is genuine and considerable than to its refusal to grow.
Most luxury brands face enormous pressure to scale. More stores, more products, more SKUs, more entry-level pieces to capture the aspirational consumer. Hermès has, largely, refused. The entry price has risen. The volume has remained controlled. The waiting list formal or informal persists.
The result is an object that functions as jewellery, as fashion, as social currency, and as an inflation hedge. The woman carrying a Birkin in 2025 is doing all of these things simultaneously, whether she intends to or not.
Whether this is a triumph of craft and vision or an elaborate financial product dressed in Clemence leather is, perhaps, the most fashion question imaginable: it is both, entirely, at the same time.
Leave a Reply